Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The CHA2DS2-VASc congestive heart failure, hypertension, age (≥75 years earns 2 points, 65–74 years earns 1 point), diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism (2 points), vascular disease (eg, prior myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease), and female sex category score has demonstrated potential as a prognostic indicator for adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the predictive accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in determining the occurrence of stroke and mortality in HF patients. We did a thorough search of electronic databases until December 2023. Included studies examined the correlation between the CHA2DS2-VASc score and the likelihood of stroke or death in patients with HF. The meta-analysis showed a substantial correlation between elevated CHA2DS2-VASc scores and heightened risks of both stroke and mortality in HF patients. Patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥4 had a greater stroke risk than those with scores <4 (odds ratio, 0.38, 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.43, P < 0.00001). Similarly, patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥4 had a higher mortality risk (OR, 0.49, 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.80, P = 0.05). The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a useful predictive tool for identifying HF patients who are at a high risk of both stroke and mortality. Additional investigation is necessary to confirm these findings and examine the incorporation of the CHA2DS2-VASc score into risk assessment algorithms for tailored patient management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohamed Riad Abouzid
Ibrahim Kamel
Amr Saleh
Cardiology in Review
Yale University
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Baptist Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Abouzid et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c0efb6db643587558bc7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000000749
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: