Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Compared to those of other African countries, studies examining LGBTIQ + in Nigeria are scarce, while the perceptions of people with an LGBTIQ + orientation have not received adequate scholarly attention. In view of this, the present study aimed to explore the perceptions of the LGBTIQ + population in a cosmopolitan Nigerian city.Method This study utilized a cross-sectional analytical survey design and purposive technique to analyze the perceptions of 302 respondents to understand the disposition of people toward members of LGBTIQ + and, in so doing, to deduce workable pathways for handling the stigmatizing, discriminating and ostracizing treatment members of the LGBTIQ + experience. In assessing the key study variables, a qualitative 5-statement semi-interview questionnaire was developed and validated by the researchers to investigate the research objectives. Using IBM SPSS statistical tools, descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized.Results The results showed a prevalence rate of 40.7% for perceived severe criminalization by LGBTIQ + persons, while the main finding employing hierarchical regressions was that gender was the only independent significant predictor of perception of LGBTIQ+ (β = − .13, SE = .06, F = 5.37; p = .02), accounting for 1.8% of the variance in perceptions of the LGBTIQ + community and criminalization dimensions. Additionally, the majority of participants suggested severe measures for necrophilia, bestiality, and transsexuals; they were moderate toward gay and lesbian individuals in comparison.Conclusions In line with the findings, conclusions and recommendations were outlined, while policy implications and conclusions were drawn in a bid to address societal perceptions about the LGBTIQ + community and projected pathways in criminalizing the LGBTIQ + population in Nigeria.
Iloma et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: