Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, a growing body of research uses Evidence Accumulation Models (EAMs) to study individual differences and group effects. This endeavor is challenging because fitting EAMs requires constraining one of the EAM parameters to be equal for all participants, which makes a strong and possibly unlikely assumption. Moreover, if this assumption is violated, differences or lack thereof may be wrongly found. To overcome this limitation, in this study, we introduce a new method that was originally suggested by van Maanen & Miletić (2021), which employs Bayesian hierarchical estimation. In this new method, we set the scale at the population level, thereby allowing for individual and group differences, which is realized by
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Berkovich et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5bfb4b6db643587557f1b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.394
Rotem Berkovich
Nachshon Meiran
Journal of Cognition
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...