Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Automatic medical image segmentation is a crucial topic in the medical domain and successively a critical counterpart in the computer-aided diagnosis paradigm. U-Net is the most widespread image segmentation architecture due to its flexibility, optimized modular design, and success in all medical image modalities. Over the years, the U-Net model has received tremendous attention from academic and industrial researchers who have extended it to address the scale and complexity created by medical tasks. These extensions are commonly related to enhancing the U-Net's backbone, bottleneck, or skip connections, or including representation learning, or combining it with a Transformer architecture, or even addressing probabilistic prediction of the segmentation map. Having a compendium of different previously proposed U-Net variants makes it easier for machine learning researchers to identify relevant research questions and understand the challenges of the biological tasks that challenge the model. In this work, we discuss the practical aspects of the U-Net model and organize each variant model into a taxonomy. Moreover, to measure the performance of these strategies in a clinical application, we propose fair evaluations of some unique and famous designs on well-known datasets. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive implementation library with trained models. In addition, for ease of future studies, we created an online list of U-Net papers with their possible official implementation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Reza Azad
Ehsan Khodapanah Aghdam
Amelie Rauland
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Stanford University
RWTH Aachen University
University of Regensburg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Azad et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8b9338df8c70967ae2a1a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2024.3435571
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: