Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
(1) Background: Estimating the causal association between nutrient intake, as a modifiable risk factor, and stroke risk is beneficial for the prevention and management of stroke. However, observational studies are unavoidably influenced by confounding factors and reverse causation. (2) Methods: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to estimate the effects of nutrient intake on stroke risk. Summary statistics for nutrients, including 4 macronutrients and 14 micronutrients, were derived from 15 genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Data on stroke and its subtypes were sourced from the MEGASTROKE consortium. (3) Results: Genetically predicted magnesium levels, as the protective factors, were significantly associated with a lower risk of cardioembolic stroke (OR: 0.011, 95% CI: 0–0.25, p-value: 0.005) in the IVW method. Additionally, vitamin C reduced the risk of cardioembolic stroke (OR: 0.759, 95% CI: 0.609–0.946, p-value: 0.014) and vitamin B9 reduced the risk of small vessel stroke (OR: 0.574, 95% CI: 0.393–0.839, p-value: 0.004) with the IVW method. However, the association of vitamin B6 with an increased risk of large-artery stroke (OR: 1.546, 95% CI: 1.009–2.37, p-value: 0.046) in the Wald ratio method should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited number of SNPs. There was also suggestive evidence that magnesium might decrease the risk of both any stroke and ischemic stroke. (4) Conclusions: Our MR analysis highlights the protective roles of magnesium, vitamin C, and vitamin B9 in stroke prevention, making them key targets for public health strategies. However, the findings related to vitamin B6 are less certain and require further validation.
Dong et al. (Fri,) studied this question.