Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Spray penetration into citrus canopies is critical for adequate coverage and deposition to ensure effective pest control. However, mismatch of air assistance to target canopy characteristics can lead to unintended spraying losses through overpenetration. To evaluate the effect of air assistance on on-target deposition, two sprayers (surrogates for airflow rates) were used to apply a fluorescent tracer dye solution @ a target concentration of 300 ppm to 16 medium-foliage-density tree blocks in a commercial mandarin orchard. The complete factorial experiment in three replications, also designed for validating a model-based spray decision support tool, comprised two forward travel speeds (1.6 and 4.8 km/h), two disc-core nozzles (TeeJet® D3-25 and D6-45), and either one or two nozzle rows to obtain a wide range of application rates (496 to 9719 L/ha). Dye deposition significantly decreased with canopy depth (p =< 0.001) by nearly seven times across the 3.4 m wide canopies but was not significant over 1.2 to 2.2 m sampling height (p = 0.867). Deposition obtained with the low-airflow-rate sprayer was significantly greater (p =< 0.001) than that obtained with the high-airflow-rate sprayer over the dose range likely due to too much air pushing out spray droplets. This study underscores the importance of matching the air assistance of orchard sprayers to the target canopy.
Peter Ako Larbi (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: