Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Diesel adulteration not only reduces engine performance and lifespan but also has a stiffening effect on the economy. Therefore, regulatory agencies and petroleum laboratories are constantly adopting various methods to ensure that commercial diesel is pure and of good quality. Despite the introduction of solvent tracer analysis as a reliable means of detecting adulteration, most laboratories still depend on the physicochemical parameters of diesel as an indicator of adulteration. This research aimed to document the feasibility of using quality parameters to detect diesel adulteration. Neat diesel samples were mixed with some common adulterants (kerosene, premix, and condensate) at varying concentrations. The quality of each admixture was analysed using the ERASPEC fuel analyser and physicochemical parameters including density, kinematic viscosity, cetane index, and flashpoint were recorded. A negative correlation was observed between adulteration and all quality parameters. At low levels of adulteration, physicochemical parameters were within the required range. However, diesel with adulterants above 20 % v/v had cetane index, density, and flashpoint values not conforming with quality standards. Kinematic viscosity of diesel remained within the required limits despite the levels of adulteration. Physicochemical parameters, though generally accepted as good indicators of fuel quality, were not reliable indicators of diesel adulteration, especially at low levels. At higher levels of adulteration, the type of adulterant present must be considered if physicochemical parameters are to be used to predict adulteration. However, it is recommended that physicochemical parameters be used in combination with other techniques to detect diesel adulteration.
Dadson et al. (Tue,) studied this question.