Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In addition to restoring function, after restoring a lost tooth, it is essential to plan the return of aesthetics to the patient.The development of ceramic materials for use in dentistry, both on remaining dental structure and on implants, has enabled improvements in aesthetic results, since ceramics allow greater mimicry of the nuances of a natural tooth.The objective of this study was to present concepts and applications of ceramic materials in implantology, based on a literature review through electronic research.Ceramics can be classified as vitreous and non-vitreous, which is directly linked to the physical and chemical characteristics of each material, and these properties will determine the resistance to fracture and its aesthetic characteristics.Therefore, knowing the nature of each type of ceramic will affect the correct selection of the material to be used in rehabilitation.Ceramics can be used in implantology in all its elements, including: implant, abutment and crown.The research conducted concluded that vitreous crowns stand out for their aesthetic results, but they are very brittle, which limits their use in areas of high stress.Non-vitreous crowns, on the other hand, have excellent mechanical properties but leave something to be desired in terms of aesthetic qualities.Therefore, the combination of the two types of ceramics can provide resistance and aesthetics at the same time.Ceramic abutments have emerged as a viable alternative for the rehabilitation of patients with thin gingival profiles, and zirconia implants have favorable biocompatibility and osseointegration for their clinical use.
Mata et al. (Tue,) studied this question.