Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This article explores Biesta’s recent revisiting of his iconic and at times contested notion of education as subjectification. First, I look at how Biesta presents his notion by attending to his answers to the criticisms it has faced concerning elusiveness, oversimplification, and self-centredness. Then, going beyond the declarative level, I explore a concrete example of education as subjectification from Biesta’s 2022 book, World-Centred Education. Analysing the example of Homer Lane and Jason, I examine the ambivalence between Biesta’s explicit statements on subjectification as a form of spontaneous and noncoercive teaching aimed at cultivating freedom and the more complex picture that emerges from a close reading of the original story. From this analysis, I find important conceptual limitations to education as subjectification: it could conceal part of the institutional context of education and the teacher’s active role, and also reduce freedom to an individualistic concept. I thus conclude by suggesting that the language of subjectification should always be engaged with critically—but never in isolation—and with a stereoscopic optic in mind.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elodie Guillemin (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b9b2b6db643587551e84 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae057
Elodie Guillemin
Journal of Philosophy of Education
University of Oslo
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...