Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Aim We performed a single-centre closed loop audit assessing the completeness and quality of e-discharge summaries following cardiac surgery against local standards. Method The e-discharge summaries of patients who underwent cardiac surgery form 1/08/2023 to 10/08/2023 were audited against the standards set by the local hospital’s e-discharge summary template. Results and recommendations were shared at a team meeting of the hospital, and on a poster displayed in the MDT office. The same data was then collected for patients who underwent cardiac surgery from 25/10/2023 to 6/11/2023. Results 110 patients were included across 2 cycles. Of 16 domains of interest, 5 were complete in 100% of e-discharge summaries in the first cycle, increasing to 7 in the second. The proportion of summaries with the ‘reason for admission’ misplaced in the clinical summary instead of the allocated field decreased from 43% to 40%, while proportion of GP requests with the reasoning in the allocated box rose from 55% to 57%.For those with no requests to the GP, this was initially specified in the mandatory field as N/A or equivalent in 23% rising to 48% in cycle two, whereas for those who had no ECHOs during the admission, this was specified in 20% initially, rising to 27%. The proportion avoiding acronym use decreased from 17% to 15%. Conclusions Even though compliance improved between the two cycles, the standard of 100% was not met for most criteria. Further team education and revision of the template itself is required to allow information reporting in a succinct, user-friendly format.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nihal Sogandji
University of Cambridge
Jason M. Ali
University of Cambridge
British journal of surgery
University of Cambridge
University of Ulster
Royal Victoria Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sogandji et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e624b1b6db6435875b73e6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae163.226