Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction: Adherence to mesalamine therapy in ulcerative colitis is often inadequate. This affects long-term remission and to some extent the risk of colon cancer. Means for assessing non-adherent behavior are cumbersome, expensive, and/or time consuming. Unless multiple tools are used in association, a proportion of patients with volitional and non-volitional non-adherence is nonetheless undetected. The study was aimed at evaluating to which extent rephrasing a single question on adherence to mesalamine therapy may help identifying patients who are not compliant with medication prescription. Methods: One-hundred and seventy-four inflammatory bowel disease outpatients were asked in two consecutive visits, in random order, if they “regularly assumed the prescribed dose of mesalamine” (adherence-centered question—AQ) or “how often they skipped mesalamine pills” (non-adherence centered question—NQ). Answer concordance was evaluated in relation to clinical and demographic variables. Results: The concordance between AQ and NQ was low (K = 0.22). Lower compliance to therapy was admitted in 37.4% more patients following NQ than AQ. The reported adherence to AQ was invariably higher than that of NQ, irrespective of the variable taken into consideration. The likelihood of non-concordant answers was non-significantly higher in CD patients than in UC and in patients with shorter disease duration than in those with longstanding disease, but the logistic regression model did not identify individual variables responsible for the different answers. Conclusions: Being simple and not requiring additional time expense, centering the question on medication non-adherence identifies a large proportion of patients who would not admit non-adherence or underestimate the number of skipped doses of medication, when directly asked if they are compliant to therapy.
Vernia et al. (Fri,) studied this question.