Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is increasingly used in clinical practice for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. While the susceptibility of erythrocytes to electroporation is well established, the effect of cardiac PFA technologies on hemolysis has remained underreported. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, severity, and clinical impact of PFA-induced hemolysis. METHODS: We included n=145 patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter (biphasic, bipolar pulses of 2 kV) and n=70 patients receiving radiofrequency ablation (40–90 W) at 4 high-volume European centers. The lesion set comprised pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and pulmonary vein isolation±additional lesions for persistent atrial fibrillation. Hemolysis and renal function biomarkers were analyzed in blood samples at baseline, at the end of ablation, and 24 hours after the procedure. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups (overall mean 65.7±9.4 years; 69.3% men). The ablation procedures comprised a mean of 61.6±27.4 PFA deliveries and 26.3±15.0 minutes RF duration. Hemolysis was detected in 94.3% versus 6.8% of patients after PFA versus radiofrequency ablation ( P 50 mL/min (Δcrea, 27.0±103.1 versus −0.2±12.1 µmol/L; P =0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular hemolysis is a frequent finding after PFA and increases with the number of PFA deliveries. Until the clinical impact of PFA-associated hemolysis is fully elucidated, a careful titration of PFA deliveries during the ablation procedure is warranted.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Miruna Popa
Sandrine Venier
Roberto Menè
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Inserm
Technical University of Munich
Université de Bordeaux
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Popa et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a2bab6db64358753cfdb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.124.012732
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: