Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction and functional capacity, while SGLT2 inhibitors reduced myocardial fibrosis more effectively.
Meta-Analysis (n=3,428)
3,428 adult patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes mellitus, followed for 6 to 24 months.
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1-RA vs Placebo or standard treatments
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for SGLT2 inhibitors — MD 3.2% (2.0 to 4.4), p=< 0.001
Mean Difference: 3.2 (95% CI 2–4.4)
p-value: p=< 0.001
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), leading to high morbidity and mortality. Managing HFpEF in diabetic patients is challenging with limited treatments. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have shown potential cardiovascular benefits. This meta-analysis compares the effects of GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors on HFpEF in T2D patients. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors' impact on HFpEF in T2D patients. Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library up to July 2024. Primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume fraction, ECV), and functional capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP). RESULTS: Twelve studies with 3,428 patients (GLP1-RA: 1,654; SGLT2 inhibitors: 1,774) were included. Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved LVEF compared to placebo (GLP1-RA: mean difference MD 2.8%, 95% confidence interval CI 1.5 to 4.1, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 3.2%, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.4, p < 0.001). SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced myocardial fibrosis (MD -3.5%, 95% CI -4.2 to -2.8, p < 0.001) more than GLP1-RA (MD -2.3%, 95% CI -3.0 to -1.6, p < 0.001). Functional capacity improved significantly with both treatments (GLP1-RA: MD 45 m, 95% CI 30 to 60, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 50 m, 95% CI 35 to 65, p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed reductions in HbA1c (GLP1-RA: MD -1.1%, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.8, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -1.0%, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.7, p < 0.001) and body weight (GLP1-RA: MD -2.5 kg, 95% CI -3.1 to -1.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -2.0 kg, 95% CI -2.6 to -1.4, p < 0.001). Both treatments significantly lowered SBP (GLP1-RA: MD -5.2 mmHg, 95% CI -6.5 to -3.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -4.8 mmHg, 95% CI -6.0 to -3.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly benefit HFpEF management in T2D patients. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce myocardial fibrosis more effectively, while both improve LVEF, functional capacity, and metabolic parameters. These therapies should be integral to HFpEF management in diabetic patients. Further research is needed on long-term outcomes and potential combined therapy effects.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arif Albulushi
National Heart Hospital
Desmond Boakye Tanoh
Mercy Hospital and Medical Center
Ahmed Almustafa
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
Cardiovascular Diabetology
University of Nebraska Medical Center
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
Nebraska Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Albulushi et al. (Sat,) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) (n=3,428). SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1-RA vs. Placebo or standard treatments was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for SGLT2 inhibitors (MD 3.2%, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.4, p=< 0.001). Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction and functional capacity, while SGLT2 inhibitors reduced myocardial fibrosis more effectively.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a25bb54cb664c91ece97457 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02415-8
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: