Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Deep learning (DL) models offer improved performance in electrocardiogram (ECG)-based classification over rule-based methods. However, for widespread adoption by clinicians, explainability methods, like saliency maps, are essential. On a subset of 100 ECGs from patients with chest pain, we generated saliency maps using a previously validated convolutional neural network for occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) classification. Three clinicians reviewed ECG-saliency map dyads, first assessing the likelihood of OMI from standard ECGs and then evaluating clinical relevance and helpfulness of the saliency maps, as well as their confidence in the model's predictions. Questions were answered on a Likert scale ranging from +3 (most useful/relevant) to −3 (least useful/relevant). The adjudicated accuracy of the three clinicians matched the DL model when considering area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and F1 score (AUC 0.855 vs. 0.872, F1 score = 0.789 vs. 0.747). On average, clinicians found saliency maps slightly clinically relevant (0.96 ± 0.92) and slightly helpful (0.66 ± 0.98) in identifying or ruling out OMI but had higher confidence in the model's predictions (1.71 ± 0.56). Clinicians noted that leads I and aVL were often emphasized, even when obvious ST changes were present in other leads. In this clinical usability study, clinicians deemed saliency maps somewhat helpful in enhancing explainability of DL-based ECG models. The spatial convolutional layers across the 12 leads in these models appear to contribute to the discrepancy between ECG segments considered most relevant by clinicians and segments that drove DL model predictions.
Riek et al. (Mon,) studied this question.