Realism: The Picture Behind International Law and Democracy

Realism and international law are two distinct parts of state politics which practice two different sets of paradigms under the same contemporary state politics. Realism, as compared to international law and humanitarianism, idolizes the concept of self-centeredness and epilepsy that tented the words of survival of the fittest. Within the dimension of history, the state has practiced the concept of realism because the nature of humanity has ascribed to the point where individual and state itself lives under the system of anarchy, where human beings were self-interests in their own goal and perceptions of the individualism which is very much contradicted to the politics we tend to witness today The main reason for this article will be to view how realism, international human rights, and international law’s dominions and phenomena collide in two different aspects. Firstly, the article will foretell the directions of realism in an episode of humanitarian rights, under correlational powers of materialism and democratic law that is, why it establishes liberal anarchy of racism, ethnicity, and nationalist separatist astrology tends to demotivate humanitarian rights. Secondly, the article will hold references to various critics that core-relates modern democracy as a new variant of the realist paradigm on classical grounds and global politics. Lastly, the realist constrain to humanitarian and democratic law and human rights will be outcaste that can make us understand the regional power politics of self-help and interest guided by theories and international communitarian policies determinant by states themselves