Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper discusses the profound impact of generative AI (GAI) technologies, like ChatGPT, on academic writing and research. GAI tools have revolutionized content creation, offering capabilities such as text generation, grammar improvement, and literature scanning. However, the letter raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding the use of GAI in the peer review process and its potential to introduce plagiarism and bias. It emphasizes that while GAI can enhance productivity, it cannot be considered a co-author due to its inability to assume responsibility for the content. The letter calls for clear acknowledgment of GAI's contributions in academic work while upholding the essential role of human oversight to maintain integrity and ethical standards in research and publishing.
Mahmut Özer (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: