Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article compares anti-corruption legislation in Moldova and Ukraine, examining their alignment with each other which is essential in the context of their aspirations for European integration. It analyses primary legal rules and relevant court judgements, emphasising differences and similarities in defining and interpreting corruption. Moldova’s broader approach contrasts with Ukraine’s focus on public sector corruption exclusively, revealing varying degrees of harmonisation. The study concludes that despite sharing foundational elements in defining corruption, both countries need to improve transparency and accountability standards to meet European anti-corruption standards
Iurie Patricheev (Thu,) studied this question.