Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Hysterectomy remains the most commonly performed gynecologic procedure worldwide, undertaken primarily for benign pathologies. The choice between total hysterectomy (TH) and subtotal hysterectomy (STH) has been debated, particularly with respect to its impact on sexual functioning (SF). Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of TH versus STH on SF and to determine whether preservation of the cervix in STH offers advantages in terms of postoperative SF. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted at Ibn El Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, Tunisia, involving women aged 40 to 65 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions between January 2, 2020, and December 31, 2021. SF was evaluated using the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) before and six months after surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26. Results Sixty women were included, with 30 undergoing TH and 30 undergoing STH. Postoperative evaluations revealed improvements in SF in both groups without statistically significant differences between TH and STH in terms of SF scores or the timeline for resuming sexual activity. Conclusions Hysterectomy, regardless of the technique used, appears to have a positive impact on SF, largely attributed to symptomatic relief. Therefore, the choice between TH and STH should consider factors beyond potential differences in SF outcomes. Women considering hysterectomy for benign indications should be informed of these findings to aid in the decision-making process regarding their surgical options.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohamed Ferhi
Ibn Sina Hospital
Nadia Marwen
Mohamed I University
Ameni Abdeljabbar
Hôpital Charles-Nicolle
Cureus
Ibn Sina Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ferhi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e591f9b6db64358752d180 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68876