Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate serum levels of galectin-3 (Gal-3) and N-terminal pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with stable obstructive coronary artery disease, as well as their potential to predict clinical outcomes. Methods This was a single-center cross-sectional cohort study. 168 patients were divided into three groups: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (N 64), coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) group (N 57), and group with no coronary stenosis (N 47). Gal-3 and NT-proBNP levels were measured and the Syntax score (Ss) was calculated. Results The mean value of Gal-3 was 19.98 ng/ml and 9.51 ng/ml ( p 0.001) in the study group and control group, respectively. Highest value of Gal-3 was found in the group of subjects with three-vessel disease ( p 0.001). The mean value of NT-proBNP in the study group was 401.3 pg/ml, and in the control group 100.3 pg/ml ( p = 0.159). The highest value of NT-proBNP was found in the group of subjects with three-vessel disease ( p = 0.021). There was a statistically significant association between Gal-3, NT-proBNP and occurrence of adverse cardiovascular event ( p = 0.0018; p = 0.0019). Conclusion Gal-3 and NT-proBNP could be used as an additional tool for diagnosis and severity assessment of stable obstructive coronary artery disease. Furthermore, it could help identify high-risk patients who could experience major adverse cardiovascular events.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ivica Bošnjak
Dražen Bedeković
Kristina Selthofer-Relatić
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
University of Osijek
Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Klinički bolnički centar Osijek
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bošnjak et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e58cceb6db643587528a46 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1458120
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: