Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Objectives of this study were to identify if pain management strategies at the time of castration impact feed and water intake, performance, or blood cortisol concentrations in weaned beef steers. Black Angus and Simmental Angus cross bulls n = 30; average age = 8 ± 1 mo, average body weight (BW) = 272 ± 45.5 kg were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) Control (CON; n = 10 bulls), castrated via banding; 2) Analgesic (M; n = 10 bulls), received an analgesic (meloxicam; 1 mg/kg BW) immediately after banding; or 3) Anesthetic + analgesic (ML; n = 10 bulls), received an intra-scrotal and intra-cord anesthetic (total lidocaine 15 to 20 mL + 10% sodium bicarbonate) injection immediately prior to banding and an analgesic (meloxicam; 1 mg/kg BW) immediately after banding. Blood collections to measure blood cortisol concentrations were taken on d -7, -0, +0 (day of castration pre- and post-procedure, respectively), 1, and 8. Data were analyzed as repeated measures using the MIXED procedure of SAS with treatment, day, and their interaction as fixed effects and animal as a random effect. While administering analgesics or anesthetics may reduce discomfort, the results of this study showed that these pain management practices do not significantly impact (P ≥ 0.07) on feed (CON = 7.41 ± 0.27 kg; M = 7.72 ± 0.27 kg; ML = 8.06 ± 0.27 kg) and water intake (CON = 20.90 ± 0.69 kg; M = 23.04 ± 0.69 kg; ML = 22.58 ± 0.69 kg), performance (CON = 345.40 ± 12.09 kg; M = 356.97 ± 12.09 kg; ML = 331.93 ± 12.09 kg), or blood cortisol concentrations (CON = 1.01 ± 0.19 ug/Dl; M = 1.19 ± 0.19 ug/Dl; ML = 1.38 ± 0.19 ug/DL). These data indicate that peri-castration pain management strategies can be adopted at the producers’ managerial discretion.
Brandner et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: