Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Objectives Physician’s evaluation of interstitial lung disease (ILD) extension with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) has limitations such as lack of objectivity and reproducibility. This study aimed to investigate the utility of computer-based deep-learning analysis using QZIP-ILD® software (DL-QZIP) compared with conventional approaches in connective tissue disease (CTD) -related ILD. Methods Patients with CTD–ILD visiting our Rheumatology Centre between December 2020 and April 2024 were recruited. Quantitative scores, including the percentage of lung involvement in ground-glass opacity (QGG), total fibrotic lesion (QFIB), and overall ILD extension encompassing both QGG and QFIB (QILD), calculated by DL-QZIP, were compared with semiquantitative visual method, employing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). We compared the capability of QILD scores to distinguish patients with forced vital capacity (FVC) % 70 in both methods determined by the area under the curve (AUC) by the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and DeLong’s test. Results Eighty patients (median age, 66 years; 14 men) were included. Median QGG, QFIB, and QILD scores were 3.45%, 2.19%, and 5.35% using DL-QZIP, and 3.25%, 4.06%, and 8.48% using visual method, respectively. Correlations between DL-QZIP and visual method were 0.75 for QGG, 0.61 for QFIB, and 0.75 for QILD. The AUC of QILD scores for FVC% 70 was significantly higher with DL-QZIP (0.833) compared with visual method (0.660) (p 0.01). Conclusion QZIP-ILD® demonstrates superior capability in distinguishing patients with a radiological scenario correlated to severe physiological impairment, while showing relatively good correlations in quantifying the extent on HRCT compared with conventional method in CTD–ILD.
Ito et al. (Fri,) studied this question.