Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Conservation tillage practices have become increasingly recognized as crucial strategies in the effort to achieve sustainable farming systems. These practices, which include methods such as notill, striptill, mulchtill, and ridgetill, aim to minimize soil disturbance, thereby promoting a range of environmental, economic, and agronomic benefits. This review article delves into the different types of conservation tillage practices, elaborating on their specific techniques, advantages, and potential drawbacks. It examines how these practices influence soil health by enhancing soil structure, increasing organic matter, and fostering biodiversity. Furthermore, the article discusses the impact of conservation tillage on crop productivity, highlighting both the yield benefits and the challenges related to pest and weed management. The role of conservation tillage in mitigating environmental issues such as soil erosion, water conservation, and greenhouse gas emissions is also explored in depth. Through a synthesis of recent research findings and case studies, this article provides a thorough analysis of the contributions of conservation tillage to sustainable agriculture. It also offers practical recommendations for farmers, policymakers, and researchers to optimize the adoption and effectiveness of conservation tillage practices, ultimately aiming to support a transition towards more resilient and sustainable farming systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Minakshi Bezboruah
Assam Agricultural University
Satish Kumar Sharma
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu
Thejavath Laxman
Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bezboruah et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e580d4b6db64358751e8af — DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i92892