Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A rapidly developing society determines the need to adjust well-established approaches to understanding and regulating crime prevention mechanisms. It should be noted that the modern criminal policy of the state is on the verge of systemic changes. Balance of public and private interests; authority and independence of subjects of criminal proceedings; means of combating crime and social control; public and secret methods of exposing criminals; conflict and compromise; defense and prosecution; complex and simplified procedural forms of legal proceedings; inevitability of criminal prosecution and conciliation procedures; verbal and digital technologies in legal proceedings; professional skills and technical means — these are the few systemic formations, the content of which requires a modern rethinking with dew regard to prevailing realities of the functioning of society. And here the key supporting role in the formation of effective technologies for solving the problems of modern criminal proceedings, as a mechanism of complex systemic formations operating in the context of multifactorial law enforcement practice, belongs to criminalistic science. At the same time, an important tool in understanding and modeling promising vectors of the development of a system of private forensic theories is the synergetic approach, which significantly complements the wellestablished structural and systemic method in scientific knowledge. The use of the synergetics methodology makes it possible to identify not only the intrastructural connections of the system of forensic knowledge, but also to assess how such a system as a whole is affected by external (legal, ideological, etc.) factors. And the most important thing is to ensure the harmonious (regarding the changing realities of law enforcement practice) progressive development of individual private forensic theories.
S. L. Kislenko (Tue,) studied this question.