Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Our scoping review sought to describe how Etuaptmumk or Two-Eyed Seeing is used and reported on in Indigenous health research. Using the JBI scoping review methodology, we extracted uses of Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing from 83 articles and then categorized the reported uses of Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing according to Huria et al.'s eight CONSIDER statement domains (governance, prioritization, relationships, methodologies, participation, capacity, analysis and interpretation, and dissemination). We found that while authors used Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing in varied ways and at different stages of their research projects, characterizations of the guiding principle were often insufficiently described or overly simplified. This scoping review intends to contribute to a greater dialogue about how Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing is conceptualized and used in Indigenous health research with the goal of encouraging more intentional reporting of the guiding principle.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sophie Isabelle Grace Roher
Institute for Circumpolar Health Research
Debbie Martin
Dalhousie University
Ziwa Yu
British Columbia Children's Hospital
PLoS ONE
University of Toronto
Western University
Dalhousie University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roher et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2034160a9d8fc05fd8ddbe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310247
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: