Poster 396: Performing Sports Medicine Procedures in Ambulatory Surgery Centers Is More Cost Effective than Hospital Outpatient Departments for Medicare Recipients

Objectives: To compare the overall cost of sports medicine procedures for Medicare beneficiaries in both ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings. Secondary aims were to compare facility fees, surgeon fees, Medicare payments, and patient payments between ASCs and HOPDs. Methods: Publicly available data from The Centers for Medicare p<0.001), facility fees (2,777±1,020 vs 5,416±1,606; p<0.001), Medicare payments (2,898±928 vs 5,009±1,407 p<0.001), and patient payments (724±232 vs 1,252±352; p<0.001) compared to HOPDs. Knee procedures (n=31) at ASCs had lower total costs (4,236±2,741 vs 6,668±3,341; p=0.006), facility fees (3,408±2,507 vs 5,840±3,116; p=0.006), Medicare payments (3,389±2,193 vs 5,458±2,955; p=0.006), and patient payments (847±548 vs 1,209±429; p=0.011). Hip procedures (n=6) at ASCs had lower total costs (3,583±698 vs 6,671±1,451; p=0.025), facility fees (2,725±6689 vs 5,813±1,431; p=0.025), Medicare payments (2,866±558 vs 5,336±1,161; p=0.025), and patient payments (716±139 vs 1,333±290; p=0.025). Conclusions: Sports medicine procedures performed at ASCs for Medicare recipients were found to have overall average total cost savings of 40% compared to those performed at HOPDs (42% savings for shoulder, 36% for knee, and 46% for hip procedures). ASC use conferred lower facility fees, patient payments, and Medicare payments in all cohorts. These results inform surgeons, patients, and insurance officials of the cost-effectiveness of outpatient surgical facilities for Medicare recipients undergoing sports medicine procedures.