Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Colorectal cancer remains a major global public health challenge. Its incidence is shaped by a complex interplay of screening programmes and age, period and cohort factors. Methods We introduce a novel Age-Period-Cohort-Screening (APCS) model to analyse trends in colorectal cancer incidence in Taiwan from 2000 to 2019. Results In 2010, the incidence of colorectal cancer in Taiwan increased by 19.2% (95% CI: 13.5%, 25.3%) for men and 15.6% (95% CI: 9.2%, 22.4%) for women. This was followed by annual declines of 3.4% (95% CI: 2.8%, 4.1%) and 3.1% (95% CI: 2.4%, 3.9%), respectively. By 2015 for men and 2014 for women, the age-standardized incidence had fallen below the levels projected in a no-screening scenario. By 2019, the incidence had further declined by 12.4% (95% CI: 11.8%, 13.1%) for men and 11.6% (95% CI: 10.7%, 12.6%) for women, compared with the no-screening scenario. Cohort effects have shown a persistent rise from 1920 to 1980: incidence increased 5.8-fold for men and 3.1-fold for women. The trend began to plateau after 1980, with a noticeable decline in women. Conclusion Through its screening programme, Taiwan has successfully reduced colorectal cancer incidence by 10% as of 2019. Furthermore, the incidence due to cohort effects has plateaued and even begun to decline. However, continued monitoring remains crucial. The advanced APCS model could serve as a robust analytical tool for other researchers and policy makers evaluating the impacts of cancer screening programmes on incidence trends.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chih-Lin Kuo
Jing‐Rong Jhuang
Shih‐Yung Su
International Journal of Epidemiology
National Taiwan University
Ministry of Health and Welfare
Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kuo et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c51ab6db64358755b536 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyae123
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: