Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Despite the growing concerns about the replicability of ecological and evolutionary studies, no results exist from a field-wide replication project. We conduct a large-scale in silico replication project, leveraging cutting-edge statistical methodologies. Replicability is 30%–40% for studies with marginal statistical significance in the absence of selective reporting, whereas the replicability of studies presenting ‘strong’ evidence against the null hypothesis H 0 is >70%. The former requires a sevenfold larger sample size to reach the latter’s replicability. We call for a change in planning, conducting and publishing research towards a transparent, credible and replicable ecology and evolution.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yefeng Yang
Environmental Earth Sciences
Erik W. van Zwet
Leiden University
Nikolaos Ignatiadis
Chicago State University
Nature Ecology & Evolution
University of Chicago
UNSW Sydney
University of Alberta
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e57432b6db643587514717 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02530-5