Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract User-generated content provides a rich resource to study social and behavioral phenomena. Although its application potential is currently limited by the paucity of expert labels and the privacy risks inherent in personal data, synthetic data can help mitigate this bottleneck. In this work, we introduce an evaluation framework to facilitate research on synthetic language data generation for user-generated text. We define a set of aspects for assessing data quality, namely style preservation, meaning preservation, and divergence, as a proxy for privacy.We introduce metrics corresponding to each aspect. Moreover, through a set of generation strategies and representative tasks and baselines across domains, we demonstrate the relation between the quality aspects of synthetic user generated content, generation strategies, metrics and downstream performance. To our knowledge, our work is the first unified evaluation framework for user-generated text in relation to the specified aspects, offering both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation. We envisage it will facilitate developments towards shareable, high-quality synthetic language data.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jenny Chim
Queen Mary University of London
Julia Ive
Health Data Research UK
Maria Liakata
John Innes Centre
Computational Linguistics
Queen Mary University of London
The Alan Turing Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chim et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5742cb6db6435875141e0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00540