Retrospective Review of Falls in Medical Inpatients Following Introduction of a Falls Proforma at Wexford General Hospital

Abstract Background Inpatient falls are the largest category of preventable inpatient adverse events in hospitals coming at both great financial and safety cost to a healthcare system. Approximately 30% of inpatient falls result in injury, 4-6% resulting in serious injury with older patients have the highest risk of falling and injury. The aim of this retrospective audit cycle was to improve standards of falls assessments performed by junior doctors. Methods We initially conducted a retrospective review of 7 medical inpatient falls in July 2023. Standards were compared against NICE Guidelines on Assessment and Prevention of Falls in older people 2013 and NICE guidelines on Assessment and early management of head injury 2023. 15 key elements were analysed: doctor identifier, date and time, history of fall, confusion, pain, loss of consciousness, amnesia, seizure, vomiting, medication review, hip fracture, wrist fracture, skull fracture, Glasgow Coma Scale and neurological deficit. One point was given for each of the 15 key elements noted in the falls review. Following introduction of a falls proforma, we re-audited 18 falls in February 2024 to analyse differences in scores. Results Prior to proforma introduction, 7 falls reviewed had an average score of 3 points. 4 falls were reviewed by SHOs, 1 each by an SpR and Intern and 1 NCHD review was unidentifiable. Mean age was 72. Following proforma introduction, 18 falls in 13 patients were analysed. 2 patients did not have a falls review, 15 were reviewed by SHOs, 1 by an Intern. Average age was 81. Proforma was used in 7 cases with an average score of 12.7, and no proforma was used in 11 cases with an average score of 5. Conclusion These findings demonstrate improved quality of falls reviews using proformas in line with guidelines compared to those without. More education is needed to incorporate proformas into standard practice.