Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background A simple prognostic model was previously developed to predict the probability of recently‐diagnosed patients reaching negative outcomes (postural instability, dementia or death) in a 5‐year period. Objectives To validate this model in an independent cohort and establish utility at later time points. Methods Validation was performed using data collected in an incident cohort at baseline, 2 and 4 years. Predicted negative outcome probabilities were compared to actual 5‐year outcomes. Results The model, based on age, MDS‐UPDRS axial score and 60‐second animal fluency, predicted poor 5‐year outcome when applied at baseline, (area under the curve (AUC) 0.80), 2 years (AUC 0.82) and 4 years (AUC 0.71). Power calculations showed that selecting a subgroup with prognostic score >0.5 reduced the sample size required for a disease‐modifying trial. Conclusions This 5‐year prognostic model has good accuracy when employed up to 4 years from diagnosis and may help stratification for disease‐modifying trials.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joana Ribeiro
Marta Camacho
Kirsten M. Scott
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
University of Cambridge
University of Edinburgh
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ribeiro et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e57074b6db64358751160e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14215
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: