Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Aircraft operators often modify aircraft configurations, install new equipment, and alter airframes to accommodate this equipment, leading to operations in flight envelopes different from original design profile. These modifications necessitate airframe structural assessments, which typically require comprehensive aircraft design data, often unavailable to operators. This study aims to develop and validate a practical method for finite element analysis (FEA) of aircraft structures in the absence of this detailed design data. Focusing on a case study involving structural analysis of an aircraft wing, this study presents assumptions and idealizations used to develop 2.5D finite element (FE) model of the wing. Fidelity of this model is established by comparing FE analysis results with experimental data. Key validation metrics include reaction forces, load distribution at wing-fuselage attachments, and deformation at reference points on the wing under design load. Comparison between FE analysis and experimental results is carried out to substantiates accuracy of these geometric simplifications and idealizations of load-carrying behaviour of structural members. Therefore, practicality of these idealizations in absence of design data is demonstrated. This study offers a novel approach for structural assessments of aircraft without relying on proprietary design data. The validated method enhances capability of aircraft operators to perform effective structural analyses, thereby extending service life of aircraft with continued airworthiness.
Aun Haider (Tue,) studied this question.