Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a widely utilized supraglottic airway device by anesthesiologists in selective procedures, particularly in cases where intubation is not feasible or when managing a difficult airway. Complicating factors such as a short neck and large tongue can hinder LMA insertion, necessitating the use of the Triple Airway Maneuver (TAM). This technique involves a combination of head elevation, anterior mandible lift, and mouth opening to facilitate airway clearance. Purpose: This study was to evaluate the relationship between the TAM technique and the success rate of LMA insertion during elective surgeries at Dr. Soedirman Kebumen General Hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional, analytic study was conducted in June 2024, involving 52 respondents selected via purposive sampling. Data were collected using observation sheets. Findings: The findings revealed that the majority of respondents were aged 17-25 years (38.5%) and had a body mass index of 18.5-25.0 (73.1%). Non-smokers constituted 73.1% of the sample, while 46.2% had occupations involving repetitive neck movements. The TAM group achieved 45 successful LMA insertions, with 44 succeeding on the first attempt and 1 on the second, compared to 7 successful insertions in the non-TAM group. However, Kendall’s tau c test (p=0.056) indicated no statistically significant relationship between TAM and LMA insertion success rates, and the correlation coefficient (0.385) suggested a weak relationship. Conclusions: the TAM technique does not significantly influence the success rate of LMA insertion
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bagas Kara Alfaridzi
Asmat Burhan
Feti Kumala Dewi
Java Nursing Journal
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alfaridzi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5612ae2b3180350efe9e3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.61716/jnj.v2i3.80
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: