Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Elite athletes are exposed to many different sport-specific stressors that may put them at particular risk for mental health symptoms and disorders. E-mental health interventions could be a feasible option to support elite athletes in need. The aim of the present study was to assess the acceptance of e-mental health interventions among elite athletes and explore its underlying drivers and barriers. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with N = 382 elite athletes. Of these, N = 275 (71.99%, 167 females) were included in the statistical analyses. The impact of various sociodemographic, sport-related and medical characteristics on acceptance was assessed. EHealth-related data and acceptance of e-mental health interventions were examined using a modified assessment based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Results Overall, the acceptance of e-mental health interventions in elite athletes can be classified as high ( M = 3.69 SD = 0.97). In the UTAUT regression model sex, financial situation, depression symptoms, digital confidence, digital overload as well as the UTAUT predictors performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence predicted acceptance significantly. Conclusions The UTAUT model has proven to be a valuable instrument in predicting of acceptance of e-mental health interventions in elite athletes. Given the strong association between acceptance and future use, new interventions should focus on the explored factors to establish effective e-mental health interventions for elite athletes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sheila Geiger
University of Duisburg-Essen
Julia Aufderlandwehr
University of Duisburg-Essen
Anna Julia Esser
University of Duisburg-Essen
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
University of Duisburg-Essen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Geiger et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e56113e2b3180350efdba2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1416045