Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background The accuracy of clinical laboratory measurements can be compromised by laboratory test interferences. PV-10 (Rose Bengal), a chemotherapy medication used in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, was observed to cause a cherry-red discoloration in plasma. This plasma color change, resembling hemolysis, raises serious concerns about potential interference in clinical laboratory tests. Our study focused on understanding the potential interference of PV-10, particularly the impact on the hemolysis index (H index) and various chemistry assays to ensure result accuracy in cancer treatment. Methods To investigate the potential interference of PV-10, pooled normal and high baseline bilirubin plasma samples were spiked with a gradient of PV-10 concentrations (0 to 22 µg/100µL). Samples were analyzed on Roche Cobas 8000 analyzer with H index and all the chemistry assays measured. Results The presence of PV-10 in plasma significantly increased the H index, in a dose-dependent manner. Specifically, the H index increased from 14 (control plasma) to 2643 at the highest PV-10 concentration (22 µg/100µL) in pooled plasma. Among all chemistry assays, most of them were not affected by PV-10. However, certain assays like IRON have dose dependent increase with PV-10 concentration. CHO2A (Total Cholesterol), TP (Total Protein), and TRIG (Triglycerides) have shown a consistent increase trend. In contrast, the DBILI values decreased with increasing PV-10 concentrations, from 6.7 mg/dL to 0.2 mg/dL. TBIL levels also demonstrated a gradual decline from 9.6 mg/dL to 8.4 mg/dL as PV-10 concentration increased in pooled high baseline bilirubin plasma. Conclusions This study provides insights into the potential interference of PV-10 in clinical chemistry assays. The elevated H index by PV-10 is not attributed to hemolysis. It is imperative for both laboratory professionals and care providers to recognize the implications of PV-10-induced plasma discoloration and its potential interference in laboratory tests.
Chen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.