Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Measurement of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) has proven value in the evaluation of ovarian reserve using assays such as the Beckman Coulter Access AMH assay. If improved sensitivity of AMH measurement can be achieved, enhanced clinical utility during the assessment of reproductive aging and ovarian response to enable staging of ovarian failure is possible (Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine 2020, Cappola et al. 2023). The Beckman Coulter DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer* has been designed with new technology that can be leveraged to improve assay sensitivity. Such technological advancements include the new Lumi-Phos PRO chemiluminescent substrate which yields markedly increased signal-to-noise, a new luminometer with increased dynamic range, and improved low-volume pipetting capabilities. Data herein summarize results from analytical verification studies of the Access AMH assay on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer. Results demonstrate an example of DxI 9000 technologies enabling sensitivity claims that are up to 20-fold improved. * The official name is DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. Methods A method comparison study was performed based on CLSI guideline EP09c, 3rd ed. to compare results for the Access AMH assay on DxI 9000 to the predicate device, the Access AMH assay on the Access 2 Immunoassay System. Within-laboratory precision was also evaluated following CLSI EP05-A3. Finally, performance at low analyte levels was evaluated following CLSI EP17-A2, and linearity was evaluated following CLSI EP06-Ed2. Results Method comparison of the Access AMH assay on DxI 9000 compared to the Access AMH assay on the Access 2 yielded excellent agreement with a Passing-Bablok slope of 1.02 for N=126 samples. Further, bias estimates for a number of key medical decision points suggest minimal bias (≤ 2%) across the assay range, and minimal non-linearity was observed. 20-day imprecision studies yielded CV’s between 2 and 5% across a broad range of concentrations evaluated. Sensitivity studies yielded estimates of limit of quantitation (LoQ) between 0.001 and 0.003 ng/mL. This represents an approximately 10- to 20-fold improvement in sensitivity claims compared to the AMH assay on the Access 2 and other commercially available automated immunoassay analyzers. Conclusions The data herein present performance data for the Access AMH assay on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer. The assay demonstrates excellent accuracy relative to the predicate device, while showing good linearity and imprecision. Of note, the Access AMH assay exhibits exceptional low-end performance on the DxI 9000 analyzer as demonstrated by the ability to enable sensitivity claims that are up to 20-fold improved in comparison to existing immunoassays for the measurement of AMH. The sensitivity capabilities of the Access AMH assay on DxI 9000 suggest an opportunity for the addition of further intended uses for scenarios where extremely low AMH measurements can provide additional value of clinical significance. Further studies are needed to fully understand additional clinical utilities of the Access AMH assay with high sensitivity capability on DxI 9000, including the assessment of reproductive aging for menopause diagnosis or ovarian response for fertility treatment.
Kuklok et al. (Tue,) studied this question.