Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Determining how economic growth affects tax revenues is crucial for fiscal sustainability, economic stabilization, and policy design. The current literature on tax buoyancy presents contrasting estimates, highlighting the need for a systematic discussion of the trade-offs associated with different estimators. This paper provides new empirical evidence by reviewing a range of panel data estimators in a large sample of 172 countries from 1990 to 2019. We find evidence of lower estimates for tax responses to economic activity in the short term relative to previous literature, suggesting a limited automatic stabilization power of tax systems. The heterogeneity in our results within and across income groups underscores the importance of choosing the appropriate estimator. Our results remain broadly unchanged when we introduce new control variables to disentangle discretionary from automatic tax revenue variations, indicating that economic cycles do not significantly influence the timing of tax policies. • We study tax revenue responses to economic growth in 172 countries since 1990. • Trade-offs in estimators arise within large, unbalanced, heterogeneous panels. • In the long term, tax revenues consistently track economic growth. • In the short term, tax revenues tend to grow at a slower pace than the economy. • The stage of the economic cycle has limited influence on the timing of tax policy.
Cornevin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: