Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The nature of Britain’s unreformed parliamentary electoral system has been the focus of interest and study for over two centuries. For the unreformed period, historians have identified a range of factors influencing the outcome of parliamentary elections: prevailing economic and social power structures; the nature, extent and effectiveness of electoral treating and corruption; and the role of political issues, among both the political elite and the electorate. Within these interpretations, the role of parliamentary boroughs dominated by electoral patrons has been seen as an important feature. This article considers one such borough, Newton in Lancashire. Often presented as the archetypal ‘pocket borough’, Newton’s parliamentary elections were indeed dominated by the lords of the manor, the Leghs of Lyme. The papers of this family show, however, that this electoral control was more complex than has previously been thought, and required significant electoral management by the family.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Richard Harrison (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e55ee7e2b3180350efbec9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.100.1.2
Richard Harrison
Bulletin of the John Rylands Library
University of York
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...