Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The article describes a methodology for determining the readiness of a university to conduct a professional (demonstration) exam for graduates of training programs for educational psychologists. The methodology includes collecting the opinions of different subjects of the site for conducting a professional (demonstration) exam at pedagogical universities: the head of the site, heads of departments, undergraduate students (future educational psychologists). The questionnaires contain two sets of questions: the conditions for practical training of educational psychologists, the readiness of pedagogical universities to introduce a professional (demonstration) exam for graduates of educational psychologists. The results of testing the methodology at MSUPE were presented, in which the following participants took part: the head of the site, three heads of departments, 61 fourth-year undergraduate students of full-time study in the direction of 44.03.02 Psychological and Pedagogical Education. The results obtained allow us to say that the university has created organizational, methodological, personnel and material and technical conditions for organizing and conducting a professional (demonstration) exam for undergraduate students. Students mastered each studied area of activity (labor function) of an educational psychologist, both separately in the elements of a professionally oriented module (disciplines, practice) and in the module as a whole. Students have experience passing such an exam in the form of an intermediate certification before the state exam.
Safronova et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: