Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Disclosure: T.H. Gibble: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly Self; Eli Lilly Self; Eli Lilly Self; Eli Lilly Self; Eli Lilly Self; Eli Lilly Self; Eli Lilly Self; Eli Lilly ≥10%, 2.7; ≥15%, 3.0; ≥20%, 3.3; ≥25%, 3.4), Physical Functioning (3.4, 3.4, 3.8, 4.4, 4.3), Mental Health (0.4, 0.4, 0.7, 0.8, 0.4), Bodily Pain (2.3, 2.5, 3.1, 3.7, 3.9), Role-Physical (1.9, 1.8, 2.2, 2.9, 2.8), Vitality (1.3, 1.3, 1.5, 1.8, 1.4), Social Functioning (0.8, 0.9, 1.1, 2.2, 2.4), Role-Emotional (0.9, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, 0.9), and Physical Component Score (3.2, 3.3, 3.8, 4.5, 4.7); improvements were less consistent for Mental Component Score (-0.1, -0.2, -0.1, 0.3, -0.2). For IWQOL-Lite-CT, improvements by weight reduction target were seen for total (18.2, 18.6, 19.7, 22.9, 24.1), Physical Function composite (13.6, 14.1, 14.9, 17.1, 17.3), Physical Composite (14.3, 14.9, 15.7, 18.3, 19.3), Physical Pain/Discomfort Composite (16.0, 16.7, 17.8, 21.1, 24.1), and Psychosocial Composite Scores (20.3, 20.6, 21.8, 25.3, 26.7). Adults meeting greater weight reduction targets generally showed greater improvements from randomization in PRO scores. Weight reduction was associated with improvement in most domains of health-related quality of life, including those relating to physical function and mental health. Adults who lost the most weight generally showed the greatest quality of life improvements. Presentation: 6/1/2024
Hunter et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: