An evaluation of square footing response on lime-treated geotextile-reinforced silty sand: contrasting experimental and computational approaches

Improving soil strength and reducing the anticipated settlement and construction cost is a great paradox for civil as well as geotechnical engineers. In this paper, these aspects and other suitable types of ground improvement are discussed based on the principles of using geosynthetics for soil reinforcement. A series of load-settlement tests were also performed to compare strength and settlement of the silty sand reinforced with lime and one layer of geotextile. The study finds the maximum insertions of geotextile at 0.2D (3.0 cm) beneath the square footing base, and the lime percentage of 5.0% increases the UBC substantially. The UBC of lime-treated and geotextile-reinforced silty sand was to an optimum of 1,360 kN/m 2 that has shown an enhancement of 258% compared to that of untreated and unreinforced silty sand that is approximately 380 kN/m 2 . Furthermore, comparative analysis between two ANN models was performed to provide improved estimate of the UBC, namely artificial neural network (ANN) and extreme learning machine (ELM). The developed computational models were then compared with experiment data, which proved that such models are more economical and effective than the expensive and time consuming conventional techniques. Consequently, based on the results, it was further validated that ELM possesses better generalization capability compared to ANN for predictive efficiency and thereby proves the efficiency of the model in estimating the ultimate bearing capacity of square footings incorporated with geotextile and lime-treated silty sand. This places the ELM model as a useful tool in the initial conceptual as well as the design for improvement steps of soil reinforcement.