Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) is a crucial process for selecting embryos created through assisted reproductive technology (ART). Couples with chromosomal rearrangements, infertility, recurrent miscarriages, advanced maternal age, known single-gene disorders, a family history of genetic conditions, previously affected pregnancies, poor embryo quality, or congenital anomalies may be candidates for PGT. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) enables the selection and transfer of euploid embryos, significantly enhancing implantation rates in assisted reproduction. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the preferred method for analyzing biopsied cells to identify these abnormalities. While FISH is a well-established method for identifying sperm aneuploidy, NGS offers a more comprehensive assessment of genetic material, potentially enhancing our understanding of male infertility. Chromosomal abnormalities, arising during meiosis, can lead to aneuploid sperm, which may hinder embryo implantation and increase miscarriage rates. This review provides a comparative analysis of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in sperm evaluations, focusing on their implications for preimplantation genetic testing. This analysis explores the strengths and limitations of FISH and NGS, aiming to elucidate their roles in improving ART outcomes and reducing the risk of genetic disorders in offspring. Ultimately, the findings will inform best practices in sperm evaluations and preimplantation genetic testing strategies.
Moustakli et al. (Mon,) studied this question.