This review highlights the potential of machine learning and deep learning models in early cardiovascular disease prediction using ECG and PCG signals, while identifying the need for larger, more consistent datasets.
Abstract Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have been found to be prevalent in society, frequently ending in death. According to the findings of a recent survey, the mortality rate is increasing due to the prevalence of adult cigarette consumption, elevated blood pressure, high cholesterol levels, and obesity. The previously mentioned causes are exacerbating the severity of the condition. A pressing necessity exists for a study on the variability of these factors and their impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD). This involves the use of advanced tools to detect the disease early on and aid in the reduction of fatality rates. With their extensive methodologies that would help in the early CVD prediction and recognition of behavioral patterns in large amounts of data, artificial intelligence, and data mining disciplines offer a broad study potential. The results of these predictions will help physicians make decisions and early diagnoses, decreasing the risk of patient death. This work compares and reports the classification, machine learning, and deep learning algorithms that predict cardiovascular illnesses. For this study, articles from 2012 to 2023 were considered; after filtering, 82 articles were chosen for primary research. Future researchers will benefit from this review on cardiovascular disorders by better understanding the Deep Learning and Machine Learning models now in the healthcare sector. The review encompasses commonly employed methodologies such as support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Additionally, this survey aggregates and presents information on the performance metrics used to report accuracy. It also goes over the most popular datasets used by various diagnostic models (ECG and PCG signals datasets). In addition, it emphasizes prominent publishers, journals, and conferences that serve as platforms for the evaluation of scholarly works. Additionally, it will facilitate their understanding of the unresolved challenges or hurdles experienced by past researchers. A lack of more extensive and consistent datasets was the most common issue, followed by the need to improve existing models.
Ameen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.