Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Slow progress towards implementation of conventional clinical bacteriology in low resource settings and strong interest in greater speed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) more generally has focused attention on next-generation rapid AST technologies. In this Review, we systematically synthesize publications and submissions to regulatory agencies describing technologies that provide phenotypic AST faster than conventional methods. We characterize over ninety technologies in terms of underlying technical innovations, technology readiness level, extent of clinical validation, and time-to-results. This work provides a guide for technology developers and clinical microbiologists to understand the rapid phenotypic AST technology landscape, current development pipeline, and AST-specific validation milestones.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Grace Reszetnik
McGill University Health Centre
Keely Hammond
McGill University Health Centre
Sara Mahshid
McGill University
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Nature Communications
University of Toronto
McGill University
McGill University Health Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Reszetnik et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dacc9faae38ff6ad836b4a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53930-x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: