Evidence-based risk stratification for exercise rehabilitation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices yielded 34 recommendations across screening, monitoring, prescription, and risk management.
Systematic Review
Does stratified management of motor risk prevent exercise-related risk events in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device?
Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) who were ≥18 years old
Stratified management of motor risk / exercise rehabilitation
Exercise-related risk events, such as sudden cardiac death and arrhythmia, exercise intensity, mortality, and readmission ratessafety
This systematic review integrates 34 pieces of evidence to guide the safe implementation, risk stratification, and monitoring of exercise rehabilitation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Background: Hierarchical management of sports risk is highly critical to ensure the safety of sports rehabilitation. Early identification, timely prevention and control of sports-related risk factors, and enhanced supervision and guidance can provide a basis for the formulation of sports programmes and the setting of sports monitoring levels. Objective: This study aimed to retrieve, evaluate, and integrate evidence for the stratified management of motor risk in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Methods: We searched for evidence according to the "6S" model of evidence-based resources. CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, CBM, PubMed, Cochrane Iibrary, CINAHL, EMbase, Web of Science, BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, and International Guidelines Collaboration Network were searched from inception to February 2024. To search for evidence on stratified management of motor risk in patients with CIEDs, this research includes guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, expert consensus, clinical decision-making, and randomized controlled trials. After methodological quality evaluation, the evidence was extracted and summarized accordingly. Results: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 pieces of evidence were screened, including 5 guidelines, 1 clinical decision-making, 5 systematic reviews, 4 expert consensus, and 1 randomized controlled trial. After reading, extracting, and categorizing, 34 pieces of evidence in 4 areas were identified, namely, screening and assessment of exercise risk in CIEDs, exercise monitoring, implementation of exercise prescriptions, and prevention and management of exercise-related risks. Conclusions: This study provides the best evidence for the prevention and management of exercise risk in patients with CIEDs, clarifies the role of nurses in evaluating, monitoring, and educating patients undergoing motor rehabilitation, and provides a basis for the formulation of clinically feasible rehabilitation programs. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD2024509622).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ruiqing Di
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zheng Huang
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Huifang Huang
Fujian Medical University
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Di et al. (Mon,) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Risk stratification and exercise rehabilitation was evaluated on Best evidence for risk stratification of exercise rehabilitation. Evidence-based risk stratification for exercise rehabilitation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices yielded 34 recommendations across screening, monitoring, prescription, and risk management.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a218187ad1657d2520f8b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1455486