Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
LLMs acquire knowledge from massive data snapshots collected at different timestamps.Their knowledge is then commonly evaluated using static benchmarks.However, factual knowledge is generally subject to timesensitive changes, and static benchmarks cannot address those cases.We present an approach to dynamically evaluate the knowledge in LLMs and their time-sensitiveness against Wikidata, a publicly available up-to-date knowledge graph.We evaluate the time-sensitive knowledge in twenty-four private and opensource LLMs, as well as the effectiveness of four editing methods in updating the outdated facts.Our results show that 1) outdatedness is a critical problem across state-of-the-art LLMs; 2) LLMs output inconsistent answers when prompted with slight variations of the question prompt; and 3) the performance of the stateof-the-art knowledge editing algorithms is very limited, as they can not reduce the cases of outdatedness and output inconsistency.
Mousavi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.