Digital health solutions for cardiovascular disease prevention improved health indicators, with 8 of 14 studies showing improved blood pressure management compared to traditional care.
Systematic Review
Do digital health solutions improve preventive behaviors and health indicators for primary or secondary cardiovascular disease prevention?
Digital health solutions, primarily utilizing smartphones and wearables, show potential in addressing modifiable risk factors for CVD prevention, though evidence on long-term hard clinical outcomes remains limited.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major global health issue, with approximately 70% of cases linked to modifiable risk factors. Digital health solutions offer potential for CVD prevention; yet, their effectiveness in covering the full range of prevention strategies is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to synthesize current literature on digital solutions for CVD prevention, identify the key components of effective digital interventions, and highlight critical research gaps to inform the development of sustainable strategies for CVD prevention. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed to identify original English-language studies published between January 2000 and May 2024 that examined primary or secondary CVD prevention through digital solutions. The exclusion criteria included: telephone-only interventions, abstract-only publications, methodology-focused studies without primary data, studies without participants or specific groups, and studies with no follow-up period. The literature search used the string with terms like "digital health," "mHealth," "mobile health," "text message," "short message service," "SMS," "prevention," "prevent," "cardiovascular disease," "CVD," etc. Study bias was assessed using the RoB 2 (Cochrane Collaboration) and the ROBINS-I tool (Cochrane Collaboration). Data on prevention components, prevention types, study design, population, intervention, follow-up duration, personnel, and delivery settings were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 2871 studies were identified through the search. After excluding ineligible studies, 30 studies remained, including 24 randomized controlled trials. The reviewed digital solutions for CVD prevention focused on baseline assessment (29/30, 97%), physical activity counseling (18/30, 60%), tobacco cessation (14/30, 47%), blood pressure management (13/30, 43%), and medication adherence (10/30, 33%). The technologies used were categorized into 3 types, smartphones and wearables (16/30, 53%), email and SMS communications (12/30, 40%), and websites or web portals (3/30, 10%). The majority of the study outcomes addressed blood pressure (14/30, 47%), exercise capacity (12/30, 40%), weight (12/30, 40%), and lipid profile (11/30, 37%), while fewer focused on nicotine dependence (9/30, 30%), medication use (8/30, 27%), quality of life (7/30, 23%), dietary habits (5/30, 17%), intervention adherence (4/30, 13%), waist circumference (4/30, 13%), and blood glucose levels (2/30, 7%). CONCLUSIONS: Digital solutions can address challenges in traditional CVD prevention by improving preventive behaviors and monitoring health indicators. However, most evaluated interventions have focused on medication use, quality of life, dietary habits, adherence, and waist circumference. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of more comprehensive interventions on key cardiovascular outcomes.
Qi et al. (Sat,) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease prevention. Digital health solutions vs. Traditional CVD prevention measures was evaluated on Cardiovascular outcomes including blood pressure, exercise capacity, weight, and lipid profile. Digital health solutions for cardiovascular disease prevention improved health indicators, with 8 of 14 studies showing improved blood pressure management compared to traditional care.