An approach combining optimization and predictive process monitoring produced schedules with higher usage rates, lower overtime, and more patients operated on compared to the original schedule.
Integrating predictive process monitoring with optimization models improves the efficiency of interventional radiology scheduling.
Abstract Interventional radiology (IR) is an increasingly used medical specialty relying on the possibilities offered by medical imaging guidance technologies to perform minimally invasive procedures (both diagnostic and therapeutic) through very small incisions or body orifices. Although the operative context is quite similar to that of the classical operating room (OR) literature, to the best of our knowledge management problems arising in the IR operative context never appeared in the healthcare management literature. This is even more true for studies that combine the OR approach with automatic extraction of information from real hospital health record data as in the present study. Two specific features characterise our case study with respect to the traditional OR literature: due to the Italian legislation, the anaesthetist (usually in a very limited number) must be present for the entire duration of the procedure (), and the IR does not have its own ward but receives inpatients from different wards (). The aim of this paper is to introduce a novel approach to determine a robust solution for our case study problem addressing both features and . Our approach is based on the interplay between optimisation and predictive process monitoring (PPM) models. The obtained results show that the proposed approach produces schedules that achieve higher usage rate, lower overtime and more patients operated on than the original schedule. We also show that the integration of PPM models within the optimisation workflow improves the quality of the output schedule with respect to the standard one‐shot optimisation.
Cunzolo et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in Interventional radiology scheduling. Optimization and predictive process monitoring (PPM) models vs. Original schedule and standard one-shot optimization was evaluated on Usage rate, overtime, and number of patients operated on. An approach combining optimization and predictive process monitoring produced schedules with higher usage rates, lower overtime, and more patients operated on compared to the original schedule.