Current smoking (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.62-5.61) and former smoking (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.19-3.34) were associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared with never smoking after STEMI.
Cohort (n=1,548)
No
Does smoking status predict major bleeding complications after STEMI independently of ARC-HBR criteria?
1,548 consecutive STEMI patients managed in a Finnish tertiary hospital between 2016 and 2022, followed for 1 year.
Bleeding risk assessment including smoking status
Never smokers
Non-access site bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding during 1-year follow-upsafety
Current and former smoking are significant independent predictors of major bleeding after STEMI, suggesting smoking should be considered a major bleeding risk factor even in patients not meeting ARC-HBR criteria.
Hazard Ratio: 3.01 (95% CI 1.62–5.61)
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk criteria (ARC-HBR) are recommended by guidelines for bleeding risk assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to identify possible other risk factors and adjust the original ARC-HBR criteria for confounders. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive STEMI patients managed in a Finnish tertiary hospital between 2016 and 2022 were identified using a database search. Data collection was done by reviewing electronic patient records. Bleeding risk was assessed according to the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary endpoint was non-access site bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding during 1-year follow-up. A total of 1548 STEMI patients were analysed. HBR criteria was fulfilled in 661 (42.7%). Multivariable competing risk analysis identified only 4 individual ARC-HBR criteria as independent risk factors for bleeding. Smoking status was identified as a novel bleeding risk factor. Current and former smokers had increased bleeding risk compared with never smokers hazard ratio (HR) 3.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-5.61 and HR 1.99, CI 1.19-3.34. In those not meeting any ARC-HBR criteria, cumulative BARC 3 or 5 incidence of current smoking was 3.40% and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) 1.36%. Thus, exceeding ARC-HBR definition for a major criterion. In the non-HBR group the prevalence of current smoking was 40.4% (n = 358). CONCLUSION: Current and former smoking predicts major bleeding complications after STEMI. Current smoking is highly prevalent among those classified as non-HBR according to the ARC-HBR criteria.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Henri Kesti
Turku University Hospital
Kalle Mattila
University of Turku
Samuli Jaakkola
Electrophysiology
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
University of Turku
Turku University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kesti et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=1,548). Current and former smoking vs. Never smokers was evaluated on non-access site bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.62-5.61). Current smoking (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.62-5.61) and former smoking (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.19-3.34) were associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared with never smoking after STEMI.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a204fc489a9728653d1edb1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae104
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: