The newly developed 22-item LESQ demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach's α of 0.953 and a content validity index of 0.939 for assessing self-management in LEAD patients after EVR.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,163)
Yes
The LESQ is a reliable and valid 22-item self-report questionnaire for assessing self-management ability in patients with LEAD following endovascular revascularization.
Introduction: To develop and psychometrically validate the Self-management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Patients Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization (LESQ). Methods: We developed the LESQ and validated it in a Chinese population. A three-round cross-sectional descriptive survey in six hospitals in China, involving samples of 271, 269, and 623 participants, respectively. The surveys were conducted between February 2021 to March 2022. Results: The final version of the LESQ, with 22 items, was divided into three domains using exploratory factor analysis: medical management, rehabilitation exercise management, and daily life management. The questionnaire had good internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's α of 0.953 and good retest reliability, with the coefficients of 0.917, respectively. The content validity of the LESQ was 0.939. The three domains of the questionnaire were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The optimal cut-off points were 52 and 70, respectively, using latent profile analysis. Discussion: The LESQ is a new self-report questionnaire for measuring self-management ability with good reliability and validity through validation.
Shi et al. (Sun,) conducted a cross-sectional in Lower Extremity Arterial Disease (LEAD) post-Endovascular Revascularization (EVR) (n=1,163). Self-Management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization (LESQ) was evaluated on Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α). The newly developed 22-item LESQ demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach's α of 0.953 and a content validity index of 0.939 for assessing self-management in LEAD patients after EVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: