Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The growing emphasis on sustainability in product development has catalyzed a significant market shift towards safer and environmentally conscious personal care products (PCPs). Consumers increasingly seek eco-friendly attributes, reflecting a reinforced awareness of the ecological and health impacts of their choices. Traditional ingredients in PCPs often raise concerns due to their environmental footprint and potential toxicity, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable alternatives. This manuscript aims to address this need by presenting experimental data on viable replacements for environmentally harmful cosmetic ingredients. By comparing these alternatives, we elucidate their environmental and safety benefits, empowering consumers, and industry stakeholders to make informed and responsible choices. Our focus extends to common ingredients such as microbeads, silicones, preservatives, UV filters, and synthetic dyes, highlighting feasible options for reformulation in PCPs. Moreover, we explore the regulatory landscape surrounding these ingredients, recognizing the crucial role of compliance with safety standards and environmental regulations. Through this work, we contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding sustainability in the cosmetic industry, providing a foundational reference for future research endeavors. By prioritizing the identification and evaluation of eco-friendly substitutes while navigating regulatory requirements, we aim to advance into a more sustainable and conscientious approach to PCP development. • Exposition to cosmetic ingredients raises health and environmental concerns. • Safety assessment of ingredients is crucial in the development of eco-friendly PCPs. • Approval of new substances into PCPs undergoes a rigorous valuation. • The growth of the cosmetic industry demands constant regulatory updates.
Couceiro et al. (Sun,) studied this question.